Showing posts with label rivalry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rivalry. Show all posts

Monday, February 4, 2013

Ohio State at Michigan Breakdown & Prediction


No. 10 Ohio State at No. 3 Michigan
Time: 9 p.m.
Venue: Crisler Center
TV: ESPN
Records: Ohio State 17-4, 7-2 Big Ten; Michigan 20-2, 7-2
Ohio State stat leaders: Points – Deshaun Thomas (20.0 ppg); Rebounds – Thomas (6.2 rpg); Assists – Aaron Craft (4.7 apg); Steals – Craft (1.9 spg).
Michigan stat leaders: Points – Trey Burke (18.2 ppg); Rebounds – Mitch McGary (6.0 rpg); Assists – Burke (7.2 apg); Steals – Burke (1.4 spg).
Current Streaks: Ohio State W4, Michigan L1
Point Spread: Michigan -8
Prediction: Ohio State has a number of things working against it for this game. First, the Buckeyes already beat the Wolverines and Michigan will be eager to avenge the loss. Second, Michigan is coming off a loss at Indiana and will be motivated to put on an impressive response at home. Third, it’s Michigan-Ohio State at Crisler. The Buckeyes have a strong defense and gave the Wolverines plenty of problems in the first meeting, but Michigan is a much different team at home. Even if Aaron Craft is able to make things difficult for Trey Burke, I expect Nik Stauskas and Glenn Robinson III to step up after really struggling in Bloomington on Saturday. This game should be competitive for most of the way, but I think Michigan will pull away late and get back on track. Michigan 66, Ohio State 57

Thursday, October 25, 2012

News on Nebraska/Wisconsin heading into this week's games


The ninth week of the season is just a few days away for both Michigan and Michigan State. Here is a look at what their opponents (Nebraska/Wisconsin) are saying about Saturday’s games.

Michigan vs. Nebraska
The big news surrounding Nebraska is the status of starting running back Rex Burkhead.
The senior running back aggravated a lingering knee injury on Saturday against Northwestern. The injury has been a problem for him all season but seemed to be cleared up heading into last week’s game.
His status for Saturday’s game is undecided and his durability for the rest of the season is uncertain.
Tommy Dahlk, of the Lincoln Journal Star has some info on Burkhead from Bo Pelini.
When asked Tuesday in the Big Ten's weekly coaches teleconference how the nagging injuries have affected the running back mentally, Nebraska coach Bo Pelini said no one on his staff is too worried about Burkhead’s psyche, and the focus is just getting him back to full strength.
“Rex is a strong-minded kid,” Pelini said. “That’s the last thing we’re worried about what his mind-set is. He’s a strong young man and doesn’t let a lot of things bother him.”
Burkhead has rushed for 405 yards and three touchdowns this season. He also has a receiving touchdown.
In Burkhead’s place, Ameer Abdullah has rushed for 615 yards and seven touchdowns. Abdullah has been a very solid performer for Nebraska, but the Huskers would prefer to have Burkhead back on the field, as he is averaging 8.6 yards per carry.


MSU vs. Wisconsin
The coach had his weekly press conference transcribed on UWBadgers.com. Here are a few thoughts he had on Michigan State.
“I don't know how many times I heard last year, if you didn't care who won those games, they were really fun games to watch. From that standpoint, they're fun. It really gets down to always you got a couple of key plays offensively that go for scores, and a huge factor, special teams has been a factor, really positively or negatively for us in every game. Playing Michigan State, you've got to be on the unexpected, whether it be fake opportunities in the special teams arena or blocks on their punts. So really got to be on top of our toes in every aspect.”
Pat (Narduzzi)’s always been aggressive in nature. No doubt in my mind that they'll bring pressure. Depending on the situation depending on our personnel groupings. The good news is Joel (Stave) is a guy that's been through some situations. Everybody has been bringing pressure on us. Got to have a great plan for him, not just prior to the snap but also during the snap itself. We saw last week where he needs to get rid of the football in certain situations.
Obviously, we built up a nice little tradition. We even played them twice in one year, which had never been done in Big Ten play. At least to my knowledge. Yea, respect Michigan State. Respect Mark Dantonio and his staff a great amount. There's certain things that, when we split the divisions, that were going to go away, and unfortunately, this is a by-product of that. But on the flip side of it, you've got really neat things popping within.
That's the way I spin it. I look at it as every year we get a chance to play Penn State and Ohio State, and for us recruiting-wise, that's very, very important. We do our fair share of recruiting in Michigan, but really probably traditionally do more recruiting against Ohio State and Penn State nationally than Michigan State itself.
The Michigan State-Wisconsin game has developed into a little rivalry as of late. It will be interesting to see what kind of intensity both teams bring into this game. Michigan State is at a crossroads for the program with its 4-4 record. Will it give up on the year or will it fight to have a winning season?
Wisconsin should be able to win the Leaders Division by default with Ohio State and Penn State out of the running, but the Badgers are probably motivated to hand the Spartans another loss based on last season’s MSU victory in Spartan Stadium.

Saturday, October 20, 2012

Final thoughts on Michigan/MSU


Michigan got the win it was looking for.
It ended the four-game losing streak to Michigan State on Saturday, 12-10.
It wasn’t a pretty game and it was closer than some expected, but the Wolverines made the plays it needed to in order to win.
Is order restored? Has the balance of power shifted back to Ann Arbor? Perhaps. At least the bragging rights have returned to Michigan.
I wrote my column from the MSU angle of the game. Keep in mind, I was at the game with Pat Caputo. He covered the Michigan angle. I don’t want any accusations of favoritism because my column focuses on the Spartans.
Cleary Michigan State is having a disappointing year and needs to figure out if it is going to go back to being an average program or if it is going to be a Big Ten contender in future seasons.
The only way that the Spartans can lay claim to something in this rivalry is if it is accompanied by accomplishments that go outside of just beating Michigan.
The same can be said for the Wolverines this year.
Obviously Michigan has a lot of championships and prestige to fall back on throughout its history, but the Wolverines are still seeking to get back to a level of championship play.
The Rich Rodriguez era took the Wolverines back, which opened the door for Michigan State to move ahead and claim bragging rights. That was supported by more than just wins against the Wolverines, but also by the Big Ten title in 2010 and the Legends Division title in 2011.
For Michigan to really put a stamp on this season and leave the Spartans in the rear view mirror, it needs to make its way to Indianapolis and play for, if not win, the Big Ten Championship.
Brady Hoke and the Michigan players said that beating MSU was good but their goals are much greater than a win over the Spartans.
Winning championships is what has separated Michigan from Michigan State in the past and will be the only thing to separate the Wolverines from the Spartans in the future.
That’s the next big step for Brady Hoke and the program, to win a championship. This year seems to be Michigan’s best shot in a while to do just that.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Fair or Foul: Judging the MSU/Michigan arguments for Saturday's game


The trash talk for the Michigan-MSU rivalry is always at a peak when the two are set to meet at the end of the week.
Such is the case this year. Michigan fans have a reason to be excited, but Spartan fans still have the bragging rights, at least for now.
Here are a few of the arguments I have heard this week and whether they hold any weight.

Argument from MSU fans: Michigan hasn’t played anyone in the Big Ten: While that may be true to a certain extent, the one thing the Wolverines are doing is easily disposing of those teams. That is something that MSU is obviously not doing. Indiana gave Ohio State a run, but I still don’t believe the Hoosiers are that great of a Big Ten team and Iowa has suffered a pair of losses to Iowa State and Central Michigan. We don’t know where Purdue and Illinois will finish in the conference, but you have to credit Michigan for taking care of business against teams it should best. VERDICT: Foul

Argument from Michigan fans: We’ve taken back the rivalry: You haven’t done that until you beat Michigan State on Saturday. You should win Saturday’s game, but if you don’t, you can’t claim hold of the rivalry. A win goes a long way, but I also think it would be beneficial for Michigan to win the Big Ten to really show that it has returned to control the in-state rivalry. VERDICT: Foul

Argument from MSU fans: Denard Robinson will go down as the QB that couldn’t beat MSU if he loses on Sunday: I think that is a reasonable statement. For all the numbers that Denard Robinson has put up in his time with the Wolverines, he really has nothing to show for it. No conference titles and no wins against Michigan State. He has a Sugar Bowl win, but a Rose Bowl victory is what Michigan fans want most. Robinson needs a win on Saturday to avoid being remembered as the guy who couldn’t beat the Spartans. VERDICT: Fair

Argument from Michigan fans: MSU is going to “thug it up” on Saturday: Michigan fans feel the Spartans got away with too many cheap shots during last year’s game. That may be true, but the refs for this game will be well aware of what took place in last year’s game. Look for them to call this year’s game tightly and not allow a lot of the post-play shoving. If the Spartans try anything funny, it will likely come with a 15-yard penalty. Also, the Spartans were at home last year and trying to intimidate Michigan, I don’t think the confidence level of MSU is high enough to bring that same attitude into the Big House this year. VERDICT: Foul

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Little Brother Scale after Week 7


I am conflicted this week.
Everything I have seen from Michigan and Michigan State this season tells me the Wolverines are, 1. not only better this season, but 2. built to be better in future seasons as well.
That is what the Little Brother Scale is meant to indicate. Not just who is better now, but what program has more credibility than the other in the eyes of the national media.
I didn’t think there was a way Michigan could get ahead of MSU before Oct. 20.
The Spartans had won four straight in this series, won a Big Ten title in 2010 and the Legends Division title in 2011.
However, the Spartans have been a shell of themselves this year.
The offense has been a mess and the Spartans are finding ways to lose this year as opposed to finding ways to win, which they did in previous seasons.
Michigan, on the other hand, is getting better. The Wolverines have looked very impressive in Big Ten play, mainly on defense. After getting out to a slow start defensively, the Wolverines have improved each week and seem primed to be one of the best in the Big Ten.
With all that said, I am ruling the scale a tie this week, simply because Michigan needs to win on Saturday for me to put it ahead on the scale.
You can’t claim superiority over another program when you have lost four straight. You just can’t do that.
So, we enter this week’s game with an even scale, but a win for the Wolverines will put them ahead. It’s all up for grabs this week, and I am sure that means much more to the players than the Paul Bunyan Trophy (I am kidding, of course).
LITTLE BROTHER SCALE: Michigan 16, MSU 16

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

News and notes from Dantonio's weekly press conference


Michigan State coach Mark Dantonio held his weekly press conference on Tuesday from East Lansing. Here are a few news and notes from what he had to say.

- Dion Sims is not listed on the depth chart again this week. Paul Lang, Andrew Gleichert and Derek Hoebing are all listed as possible starters at tight end. Dantonio said they will know more this week about Sims’ status but he has yet to practice.
- Aaron Burbridge, Tony Lippett and Keith Mumphrey are listed as the starting receivers this week.
- Kurtis Drummond to be the starter at free safety. Isaiah Lewis will start at strong safety along with Johnny Adams and Darqueze Dennard at cornerback.
- Dantonio called this a big rivalry game (obviously), and that it is good for his football program and for the team to go into a great environment like Ann Arbor on Saturday.
- He called the game a pivotal one regardless of records. Dantonio said a win is a win, it would be a big win for MSU. Beating Michigan five straight hasn’t been done before, so it would be special. He also added that you keep track of the rivalry games the rest of your life.
- When asked about the lack of fans at Saturday’s game, Dantonio said he was more concerned about the ones that show and he appreciates their support. Said it’s a fickle society and there is a lot going on in people’s worlds. Football is not the end game for a lot of people, but he’s sure it will be this week.
- Dantonio acknowledges that MSU needs help to get to the Big Ten Championship Game. He said that help usually does come and that there is a lot of parity in the conference. He just wants to focus on one game at a time and focus on the present. If they take care of their business they have opportunities in front of them.
- When asked why he approaches the rivalry the way he does, Dantonio said that people view things differently. His coaching background brought him to MSU in 1995 and he experienced things back then that shaped that. He said he has never made the rules, just plays the game. These rules were established a long time ago, he is just playing the game.
- Dantonio said he has great respect for Brady Hoke, feels that Hoke handles himself better than Dantonio does. Dantonio just goes about his job and hopes “that other guy” doesn’t show up at the press conference (referring to the “next question” guy). Feels Hoke maintains his composure well.
- Dantonio said that you can’t divide the team in terms of offense and defense. MSU is not getting it done as a team. Can’t just blame the offense or the defense.
- Dantonio said that Denard Robinson is a tremendous football player. He is the central theme to what MSU has done defensively. A lot of things that MSU does on defense center around quarterbacks like Robinson and Braxton Miller. They can take a bad play and make it into a good play. The Spartans need to know where he is at all times. Dantonio said that Robinson has been a great player at Michigan and will be remembered as that.
- Dantonio said that William Gholston has grown from last year’s situation in the Michigan game, said he needs to. Dantonio said Gholston has a lot of people watching him on a daily basis on and off the field, and he needs to handle himself accordingly. He will come ready to play on Saturday.
- Dantonio thinks Michigan is “back”. He feels MSU will continue to win and be a leader in this conference. He looks forward to competing against Michigan yearly.
- No player availability for the media this week for MSU to avoid bulletin board material this week.
- When asked why he was staying so humble and calm about Michigan, Dantonio said that the media hasn’t stoked his fire yet.
- When asked about recruiting against Michigan, Dantonio feels that kids are green or kids are blue by the time they are 14 in this state, maybe 10. Says it can be a hard to swing a kid in recruiting in this state if they have grown up a fan of the other team.
- Dantonio attributed the weather and Iowa defense to some of Andrew Maxwell’s struggles on Saturday. He said they had their issues as well with details and execution.
- Called the end of the first half against Iowa a missed opportunity that was one of many in the game that could have led to a different result. Said he now thinks of it as a long kick into the win and the rain, but they still couldn’t take that opportunity for granted.

Monday, October 15, 2012

News & notes from Brady Hoke's weekly presser


Michigan head coach Brady Hoke spoke to the media on Monday afternoon for his weekly press conference. Here are a few news and notes on what he had to say

- He felt the Illinois victory was a great team win and the most complete game the Wolverines have played this year. He said it was their best showing, but Hoke said they are still a long way from playing championship football.
- He called this week a great week. It is rivalry week and that is always special.
- Hoke feels both teams are different from last year, citing both teams lost key players. He doesn’t think the MSU defense has skipped a beat and that Andrew Maxwell is doing a great job.
- When it comes to what the MSU defense has done to Denard Robinson, Hoke always looks back to see how team’s attack him. He says that MSU has done a good job of getting off blocks and flowing to the ball against Robinson.
- Hoke added the MSU game has always been a physical contest.
- Hoke also said that there is a pretty clear line in the sand in this state when it comes to the Michigan-MSU rivalry.
- Hoke’s most memorable moment from the rivalry was the 2001 game. That was “Clockgate” in which the Spartans won 26-24 in East Lansing on the final play of the game.
- Hoke said the motivation for this game should come from playing a rival. It has to come from within and he hopes his players understand that.
- Hoke said the running backs that get carries in the game are based on feel. Michigan saw Fitzgerald Toussaint, Justice Hayes and Thomas Rawls all picked up at least nine carries on Saturday. Hoke said Rawls and Hayes have earned carries.
- No major injury concerns for Robinson. He is “fine” according to Hoke.
- The key to the improvement for Michigan has not been about adjustments in Hoke’s eyes, it has been about guys just playing better and executing better.
- When asked about Jake Ryan’s game on Saturday, Hoke said that the coaches have high expectations on him. Said Ryan has good instincts and is relentless, which is why he is able to make the plays he does.

Saturday, October 13, 2012

Week 7 Recap: Wolverines look ready to thrash Spartans


Michigan is getting better, Michigan State is getting worse.
I said it last week, and I will say it again today.
The proof is in the pudding.
The numbers from both games point to that very statement.
Michigan absolutely dominated Illinois in all areas of the game and looked like a solid team. Certainly the Wolverines are clicking on all cylinders heading into this week’s meeting with Michigan State.
The Spartans, on the other hand, looked awful.
I was on hand for the overtime loss to Iowa and shared my thoughts on the mess that was their performance. (I also had a sidebar on MSU OC Dan Roushar)
MSU actually embarrassed itself with its debacle at halftime and then proceeded to find a way to lose a close game against a lesser opponent.
The Spartans were known for their resiliency and ability to finish games over the last two seasons. This year’s team seems to be on the opposite end.
There will be plenty of talk going on this week about Saturday’s game, but the Spartans need a lot of work if they hope to beat the Wolverines.
I don’t care what the streak is or what the MSU defense has done to Denard Robinson in the past. The Spartans of the past are nowhere to be found right now.
For the Wolverines, this is a must-win on Saturday. If Michigan can’t beat this wounded MSU team, when will the Wolverines beat the Spartans again?

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Little Brother Scale after Week 3


Since introducing the Little Brother Scale during the offseason, things had continued to go well for Michigan State.
That all changed on Saturday.
The Spartans were soundly beaten by Notre Dame and their weaknesses coming into the season were amplified by a team that could contain their strengths.
It is too early to know just how good Notre Dame will be, but it is clear that MSU was a bit over-hyped (I include myself in that) after the first two weeks of the season.
With the Spartan performance, the door opens for Michigan to make some progress in the scale.
Not only because Michigan rolled UMass last week, but because the Wolverines face Notre Dame on Saturday.
The Wolverines have a track record of success against the Irish and another win over them would certainly build some confidence for the rest of the season.
Michigan still seems to be battling some issues of its own on the offensive line, which could be a factor on Saturday. Certainly the defense will have to come up with some big plays to keep the Irish to a low point total at home.
Michigan may have the athletes on offense to do what Michigan State couldn’t do, but the Wolverines are going to need someone other than Denard Robinson to step up.
MSU has a cake game against Eastern Michigan, and then the real test of where the Spartans are heading is next week when they host Ohio State.
For now, the Spartans are still ahead, but the gap is a little closer than last week.
LITTLE BROTHER SCALE: MSU 17¼, Michigan 14¾ 

Monday, September 17, 2012

Fair or Foul: Judging the Week 3 Criticisms


Things were pretty peaceful between Michigan and Michigan State fans after Week 2. Both teams won and put up some strong production numbers. There wasn’t much need for trash talk.
That peace time quickly went away this Saturday.
Following Michigan State’s loss to Notre Dame, 20-3, the Wolverine faithful came out and launched a full-force attack on the Spartans. In turn, MSU fans came back with some intriguing attacks of their own.
For that reason, I have to do another Fair or Foul

Argument from Michigan fans: MSU was exposed against Notre Dame and the Spartans are just a mid-level team again.
Nobody was hyping the Spartans more than I was last week. I thought their defense was among the best in the country and that would allow them to beat a team like Notre Dame. I definitely underestimated Notre Dame and what they would be able to do to the Spartans. Notre Dame exposed the MSU offense for the weaknesses we all knew they had coming into the season. The Spartan offensive line struggled to create running lanes and provide pass protection early, and that spelled MSU’s demise. While MSU was exposed, it doesn’t mean that the Spartans are back to being a mid-level team. Don’t forget, MSU lost 31-13 to Notre Dame last year and went on to an 11-win season. Granted, this year’s loss was at home, but the Spartans are still going to be a tough out in the Big Ten. VERDICT: FOUL

Argument from MSU fans: At least we didn’t lose 41-14 to Alabama.
This argument makes no sense at all. MSU lost at home to Notre Dame, a team that has been fighting to be in the top 25 in the past few years. Michigan lost, in virtually a road game, to top-ranked Alabama, the defending national champion. Through three games, Michigan is the only team to have scored points against Alabama. While I think Notre Dame is shaping up to have a strong year, the Fighting Irish are not the Crimson Tide. VERDICT: FOUL

Argument from Michigan fans: General mocking for losing to Notre Dame
Perhaps Michigan fans have forgotten that they head to South Bend this week. I think it would be wise to tone down the trash talk until that game is over. The biggest argument you will have so far this season that Michigan is the better team is if the Wolverines go into Notre Dame and come out with a win. But if Michigan loses, or gets dominated, all this trash talk is going to get thrown right back at you. I know Michigan has had Brian Kelly’s number, but it appears the Fighting Irish have some very good athletes on defense this season. VERDICT: FOUL

Argument from MSU fans: Why is Michigan talking trash at all? Four straight!
I can’t really argue with this one. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter who loses to whom until Oct. 20. Michigan needs to beat Michigan State to stop the verbal assault. Even a win over Notre Dame this Saturday won’t change the last four meetings with the Spartans. For Michigan to get back some control of the in-state rivalry, it needs to win this year at home. VERDICT: FAIR

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Hoke/Dantonio Quotes from Tuesday's Teleconference


Here are some quotes from Brady Hoke and Mark Dantonio from Tuesday's Big Ten Coaches Teleconference.

Brady Hoke
Opening Thoughts
We are looking forward to go out again and play at home. Our students were great and they showed a lot of support for our team. We are happy to win the game against Air Force, against a good football team, but we have a long way to go as a football team with our improvement each week that we need to have to be playing Michigan football.
On if he’s more concerned or more encouraged after these first two games
Probably a little bit of both, to be honest with you. There is some concern there, that we need to play better on both sides of the ball up front. We need to block better. We need to be a little more physical at the point of attack. From a defensive prospective, when you give up the rushing yards that we have so far, (we want to see) our defensive front playing and getting off blocks and being disruptive.
How he would like to see Devin Gardner apply his QB past and put it into being a WR
We obviously would like to see that. That helps him a little bit, knowing what Denard is seeing and what he is looking for. I think he is just scratching the surface of being the kind of receiver we need him to be.
Is it difficult to keep your team focused this week given the struggles of UMass?
No, I don’t think so. I think you see some good things they do from an offensive and defensive perspective. I know Charley (Molnar), he is going through growing pains, like we all do, and growing a program. We’ve got to get so much better as a program and our improvement has to be something that can be measured from week to week to week. We have a lot of respect (for UMass) and from all phases of the game, we need to get better.
On what he would like to see improve on the defense this week:
First and foremost, our run defense. (We want to see us) doing a much better job at the point of attack and a much better job of getting off blocks. That’s one of the things that has been discouraging. We have done a decent job of taking on blocks and pad level, but getting off blocks, I don’t think we’ve done a good job with that at all.
Did he expect these defensive issues coming into the season?
I think we all knew that we were going to be different up front defensively with three guys graduating that started and played a lot of football and were good football players. We are kind of a work in progress with some guys that haven’t played much football getting opportunities and with some guys that played some, but haven’t been full-time starters.
Do you have to be patient with so many young guys playing?
I don’t think you are any more patient. They are playing Division 1 football and recruited to play Division 1 football. There are expectations that every coach has for how they want to play the game, so when you look at it that way, we have to just keep improving. We have to keep teach fundamentals and technique…the little details of what you want to do on both sides of the ball. That is probably the biggest thing, when you’ve got young players, is them understanding how you prepare and the things you need to do to play your best.
On the “slow start” of the Big Ten this year
I don’t know about that. I think “slow start” or however you want to say it…you can spin it however you want to but we’ve got a great conference and we’ve got great student-athletes who are working hard and preparing. I’m not speaking for everybody, but our conference, at the end of the day, will hold up to anybody.

Mark Dantonio
Le’Veon Bell’s development as a runner and Brad Salem’s (RB Coach) impact
Le’Veon has always had great vision, great cutting ability and the ability to get positive yards after contact. That is one of the things he’s done since he’s come here. I think the more experience the guy gets, the more confidence a guy gets, the more instinctive he becomes. Coach Salem does a tremendous job in terms of articulating the finer points of a running back’s play or the exact….where to press or what hole to press or what gap to press in certain runs. The pass protection, the techniques and all the different things, the nuisances really of playing the game. But, inevitably it comes down to the player being able to execute and Le’Veon is able to do that at a very, very high level.
On the Big Ten’s relationship with the MAC
I think that we have had a great relationship with the Mid-American Conference. Most Big Ten schools do. I think for the most part, the in-state schools in the Big Ten actively try to play the in-state schools in their respective states. I think you look around the conference and that is pretty much the norm. (The MAC) is outstanding football. Great coaching. A lot of players you already know about, although they maybe didn’t have the opportunity to come to a Big Ten school, they were highly recruited guys and they settled at their respective schools. I think (the relationship) is a positive. It’s challenging, just like playing anybody, it’s challenging. There are some very, very good players in that conference.
Going back to the Notre Dame game 2 years ago, and the “Little Giants” call. Had he ever done it before in a game situation like that?
On the last play in the game? In overtime? No. I have never done that. Not many have, probably. As I have said before, it was about the timing of the play. We had worked on it. We had gotten sacked. We were just outside what I thought was a for-sure makeable field goal. We were just over 50 percent, I thought, if we executed the fake. I really felt like we had a cool customer. We had a guy under center, in Aaron Bates, who we had used on a lot of fakes in the previous four years. At least four or five. I felt like he was a guy who wouldn’t panic. If things broke down, he wouldn’t panic, and that’s exactly what happened. Things broke down a little bit and he had to move right or left. He moved right, stay composed and delivered.
Is there a way to prepare to make that call or is it just about feel?
I don’t know if there is any time to prepare for it. The decision had to be made very quickly. As I remember the clock went all the way down to almost zero, but we got it off. We just felt like it wasn’t a done deal. It was a 48 or 49-yard kick. Dan Conroy was a redshirt sophomore. It was his first big, big game. It was his first kick with the game on the line. I just felt like the pressure had to come to me and not to him, and that’s what we did. It’s just a game, just a game.
On the talk that MSU is carrying the banner for the Big Ten right now
I think that we have played two games. It is very, very early in the season. Last year, as I remember, we didn’t play well at Notre Dame and people sort of wrote us off. We ended up No. 9, or something like that, in the nation. People will respond. That is the nature of football, the competitive nature of it. People are going to respond and reset things and reset their compass and move forward. I think it is still very competitive in the country right now in terms of winning and losing football games. It is extremely competitive and there are so many different teams, that if their matchups go one way, the game goes the other way.
How much clearer is the receiving depth chart now compared to training camp?
When we came into camp we had quite a few players that we were looking at and saying ‘where is he at in the scheme of things’. I think now it is a little cleaner. We have designated eight guys that will travel and all eight of those guys may play. That is the reality of it. Because we are young at that position, those players need game experience to show where they are at. They can do things in practice, but they need game experience to sort of bring things along, in terms of providing that. The practice time is obviously very important as well. You have to evaluate the practice time, but all those guys will have an opportunity to be involved and play. Certainly we have three or four guys that are ahead of that group, but the other guys will play as well.

Sunday, September 2, 2012

Fair or Foul: Judging Week 1 Criticisms


One thing Michigan and MSU fans like is winning.
But, perhaps even more, they like seeing the other lose.
This week made for plenty of trash talk from both sides to the other. As an impartial party, here is what trash talk is fair and what is foul.

Argument from MSU Fans: Michigan was exposed as frauds in 41-14 loss to Alabama
Michigan wasn’t exposed as frauds in this game. Many level-headed people expected this game to be lopsided. As much as we would like to think the Big Ten is on par with any conference in the country, it isn’t. Alabama would dominate all but USC, LSU and Oregon (in my opinion) and that may even be a stretch for those three teams. I am sorry Spartan fans, but MSU wouldn’t have looked much better. The Spartan defense might have put up a better fight, but the MSU offense would have looked just as ugly. Let’s not forget that Michigan State gave up 30 points to Georgia last season, an offense that is not nearly as strong up front as Alabama. Also, the Tide rolled the Spartans 49-7 in 2010. The fact is, Michigan isn’t in Alabama’s league, but few are. VERDICT: FOUL

Argument from Michigan Fans: MSU could barely beat Boise State and that is a sign the Spartans are weak
Similar to MSU fans not giving enough credit to Alabama, Michigan fans aren’t giving enough credit to Boise State. Is this Boise State team the greatest in the Broncos’ history? No, but Chris Peterson has developed a tremendous program. He is now 73-7 as coach at Boise. You don’t get that record without developing strong talent and knowing how to win. I still think Boise State puts up another 10-win season this year. Also, MSU only won 17-13, but the Spartans made that more of a game than Boise did. MSU outgained Boise State 461-206. The Michigan State defense was dominant and the offense moved the ball consistently. The Spartans jut decided to turn the ball over four times and make a game of it. It’s easy for Michigan fans to say it played a tougher opponent this week, which it clearly did, but I am not sure Michigan beats Boise State in the opener if the two played. VERDICT: FOUL

Argument from MSU Fans: Michigan’s loss points to the Wolverines struggling with the Spartans this season
I don’t think there is a big secret on how to beat Michigan. If a team can contain Denard Robinson and make him a passer, the Wolverines struggle. The key is having the players and the speed on defense to do that. Not many teams have that combination. Clearly Alabama does, and I think history proves Michigan State does as well. Wolverine fans had to be hoping to see better passing and decision making from Robinson after an offseason of work. He is still limited as a passer and that could be a problem when Michigan runs into the top teams in the Big Ten, including MSU. VERDICT: FAIR

Argument from Michigan Fans: MSU fans have a big head
The Spartans are feeling pretty good about things after this week. MSU beat a ranked opponent to open the season and still can get better while Michigan got rolled by Alabama on national television. Nobody revels in a Michigan loss quite like the Spartan fans. MSU is taking great joy in being in a position of power in this rivalry. The Spartan fans are now treating Michigan fans as they felt they were treated for so many years. Michigan fans need to deal with it, because they will be doing the same if the tide turns back in their favor. There are still plenty of Wolverine fans that are trying to dismiss Michigan State as relevant in their lives, but we all know that isn’t true. To MSU fans, I can understand your joy and eagerness to rub any Michigan failures in their face, but as Mark Dantonio said, “It’s always darkest before the dawn.” Be prepared for the backlash to come if Michigan rights the ship. So, while I think the taunting is warranted, MSU fans are probably getting a little ahead of themselves. VERDICT: FAIR

Saturday, August 18, 2012

I'm officially on the move Michigan-OSU bandwagon


It’s been a hot topic this offseason.
Should the Michigan-Ohio State game be moved back to earlier in the season and be replaced by Michigan-Michigan State?
Pat Caputo wrote about it a few weeks ago and it was the cause of a lot of debate on Friday on 97.1 The Ticket for host Mike Valenti.
At first, I didn’t see the need to change things. I was on the side of “tradition.”
However, the more I think of it, the more it really does make sense to move the game and replace it with Michigan State.
Now, settle down Wolverine fans. That doesn’t mean that MSU is a bigger rival. My opinion is about the logistics of the new Big Ten Conference setup.
First, the MSU game means more to Michigan in regards to winning the Big Ten. To win the conference title, you have to win your division. A win over Ohio State only has half of the impact as a win over MSU does. Beating MSU also puts a loss in the column of a tough divisional opponent and increases Michigan’s chances to win the Legends Division.
Second, what good would it do if Michigan and Ohio State played two weeks in a row? I know many Wolverines say beating the Buckeyes is the most important thing each year. That is fine. But, let’s say in a couple years you beat Ohio State. Then, the following week, the Buckeyes beat you in the championship game. Did that first win really mean anything?
Third, moving the game to earlier in the season wouldn’t be killing the rivalry. It may adjust tradition, but there are plenty of great rivalry games that take place mid-season. Florida-Georgia and Oklahoma-Texas are just a few that come to mind. Does it really seem that their rivalries are lessened by playing before the final week of the regular season?
Had the Big Ten not changed to a two-division format, or even if Ohio State was part of the Legends Division, I would say there is no issue with keeping Michigan-Ohio State at the end of the season. But, it just doesn’t make sense now.
If swapping Ohio State with MSU is the big issue, it doesn’t have to be Michigan-MSU to end the season either. Michigan vs. any division opponent works. But, for interest sake, Michigan State seems to be the best option. It could be Michigan-Nebraska if that makes you feel better.
The world won’t end, the rivalry won’t die. Everything would be okay if Michigan-Ohio State is not played at the end of the season.
So, just think about it Michigan fans.